Russian strategic nuclear forces
Home
|
Current status
|
Blog
|
Site map
|
Search
|
About the project
[
Home
] [
Blog
] [Arms control]
Blog archive - Arms control
[
Nov 16, 2023: The curious case of heavy bombers' Unique IDs
]
[
Jun 01, 2023: U.S. response to Russia's New START suspension
]
[
May 12, 2023: New START data as of March 2023
]
[
Feb 21, 2023: Russia suspends participation in New START
]
[
Oct 07, 2022: Non-strategic weapons storage and deployment procedures in Russia
]
[
Sep 01, 2022: New START numbers as of 1 September 2022
]
[
Mar 01, 2022: New START numbers as of 1 March 2022
]
[
Oct 26, 2021: New START data as of September 2021
]
[
Jun 02, 2021: In defense of silo-based MIRVed ICBMs
]
[
May 09, 2021: A note on mobile missiles in the Kataev archive
]
[
Apr 01, 2021: New START data exchange continues. Here are the March 2021 numbers
]
[
Oct 01, 2020: New START data as of 1 September 2020
]
[
Apr 02, 2020: New START data as of 1 March 2020
]
[
Nov 27, 2019: Russia shows Avangard system "to maintain viability" of New START
]
[
Oct 07, 2019: New START data as of 1 September 2019
]
[
May 20, 2019: Is New START extension really that easy?
]
[
Mar 30, 2019: New START data as of 1 March 2019
]
[
Feb 19, 2019: Did the United States just change its theory of INF violation?
]
[
Jan 23, 2019: Missile launches from Kapustin Yar in 2008-2014
]
[
Jan 23, 2019: Moscow shows the 9M729 missile and its launcher
]
[
Dec 01, 2018: What was so secret? United States presents its theory of the INF violation
]
[
Nov 26, 2018: Russia insists it is in compliance with the INF Treaty
]
[
Oct 07, 2018: New START data September 2018 numbers
]
[
Jul 01, 2018: Inspections will not resolve the INF Treaty dispute
]
[
Apr 15, 2018: New START controversies
]
[
Feb 05, 2018: New START reductions completed
]
[
Dec 05, 2017: The INF Treaty culprit identified. Now what?
]
[
Oct 02, 2017: New START data exchange shows the United States and Russia are on track to meet the limits
]
[
Aug 24, 2017: Where the weapons are - Nuclear weapon storage facilities in Russia
]
[
Jul 01, 2017: Is it too late to have an informed discussion about the INF treaty?
]
[
Apr 03, 2017: New START March 2017 numbers
]
[
Oct 05, 2016: New START September 2016 numbers
]
[
Apr 03, 2016: UNIDIR project on tactical nuclear weapons is looking for a researcher
]
[
Apr 01, 2016: New START March 2016 aggregate numbers
]
[
Dec 02, 2015: On timelines and technicalities - U.S. Congress holds hearing on INF violation
]
[
Oct 07, 2015: Syria strikes, Kalibr-NK, and the INF treaty
]
[
Oct 02, 2015: New START September 2015 aggregate numbers
]
[
Jun 23, 2015: Cruise missiles and INF - What about 9M729?
]
[
Jun 07, 2015: INF Treaty compliance update (sort of)
]
[
Apr 01, 2015: March 2015 New START aggregate numbers released
]
[
Oct 01, 2014: New START September 2014 numbers
]
[
Sep 23, 2014: NPOMash completed tests of new cruise missile, continues to work on new strategic system
]
[
Aug 28, 2014: More details on Russia and the INF violation
]
[
Aug 04, 2014: Russia and the INF Treaty violation
]
[
Jul 02, 2014: Russia corrected its March 2014 New START declaration
]
[
Apr 01, 2014: March 2014 New START numbers released
]
[
Jan 15, 2014: Russian strategic forces in January 2014
]
[
Dec 03, 2013: Treaty compliance controversies
]
[
Oct 02, 2013: September 2013 New START data
]
[
Jul 04, 2013: New Russian missile and INF Treaty
]
[
Jul 01, 2013: A case for unilateral US nuclear warhead reductions
]
[
Apr 17, 2013: New START as a model for transparency in nuclear disarmament
]
[
Apr 03, 2013: March 2013 New START data
]
[
Apr 02, 2013: Shooting down the Star Wars myth
]
[
Feb 06, 2013: Object 370, Project 4202 and construction in Dombarovskiy
]
[
Dec 17, 2012: START and INF treaty inspections and data exchange
]
[
Oct 31, 2012: The myth of strategic stability
]
[
Oct 03, 2012: September 2012 New START data released
]
[
Apr 12, 2012: Parsing the New START data
]
[
Apr 09, 2012: March 2012 New START data released
]
[
Nov 23, 2011: Russia's response to missile defense
]
[
Oct 22, 2011: September 2011 New START data released
]
[
Jun 01, 2011: Some New START data released
]
[
Apr 21, 2011: Some details of the New START negotiations
]
[
Apr 07, 2011: START-type data exchange
]
[
Mar 28, 2011: Where is the New START data?
]
[
Mar 01, 2011: Russia hardens its position on tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Feb 05, 2011: New START treaty enters into force
]
[
Jan 27, 2011: Russia ratified New START
]
[
Jan 14, 2011: Duma sets its own understandings of New START
]
[
Jan 06, 2011: Offense and defense after New START
]
[
Nov 30, 2010: Missiles and tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Nov 29, 2010: U.S.-Russian discussions of missile threats
]
[
Jul 06, 2010: Republicans question the New START Treaty
]
[
Apr 30, 2010: New START on rail-mobile ICBMs and reloads
]
[
Apr 08, 2010: New START Treaty signed
]
[
Mar 31, 2010: The New START bomber count and upload potential
]
[
Mar 29, 2010: Assessing START follow-on
]
[
Mar 27, 2010: New START treaty in numbers
]
[
Mar 26, 2010: New START Treaty deal reached
]
[
Mar 12, 2010: Missile defense poisons everything
]
[
Feb 25, 2010: What to do about tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Dec 04, 2009: START Treaty expires
]
[
Dec 02, 2009: Missed START deadline?
]
[
Nov 24, 2009: How easy is it to extend START?
]
[
Nov 17, 2009: START bridging agreement
]
[
Nov 11, 2009: Post-START verification gap
]
[
Oct 13, 2009: Will Russia's numbers decline without START follow-on?
]
[
Oct 09, 2009: Last START data exchange?
]
[
Jul 22, 2009: The Moscow summit: A positive first step
]
[
Jul 06, 2009: Good progress at the Moscow summit
]
[
Jul 02, 2009: Will missile defense derail START-Plus?
]
[
Jul 01, 2009: There are many ways to count launchers
]
[
Jun 19, 2009: Russia wants better deal on missile defense
]
[
May 26, 2009: Who is afraid of Rose Gottemoeller?
]
[
May 06, 2009: Missile defense ban through the back door
]
[
Apr 28, 2009: Will the new treaty get a name? How about START Plus?
]
[
Apr 22, 2009: No SORT after START?
]
[
Apr 21, 2009: Russia wants the ABM Treaty back
]
[
Apr 03, 2009: Reaction to the Obama-Medvedev joint statement on arms control
]
[
Apr 01, 2009: Medvedev-Obama statement on arms control
]
[
Mar 31, 2009: An arms control summit?
]
[
Mar 07, 2009: Russia clarifies its position on arms control treaty
]
[
Mar 04, 2009: Broadening the disarmament agenda through START
]
[
Jan 16, 2009: Russia's new arms development
]
[
Dec 18, 2008: Formulating the next U.S.-Russian arms control agreement
]
[
Nov 26, 2008: All clear for START extension
]
[
Oct 30, 2008: Post-START drafts
]
[
Oct 18, 2008: START extension formalities
]
[
Oct 17, 2008: No major changes in numbers in the first half of 2008
]
[
Sep 05, 2008: Work on post-START agreement
]
[
Jul 22, 2008: The Window of Vulnerability That Wasn't
]
[
Jun 03, 2008: The push for a new arms control agreement with Russia is ill-conceived
]
[
May 24, 2008: Post-START differences
]
[
Mar 04, 2008: Arms race then and now
]
[
Feb 29, 2008: The U.S. satellite shootdown: An unnecessary action
]
[
Feb 27, 2008: USA 193 debris
]
[
Feb 20, 2008: USA 193 intercept
]
[
Feb 15, 2008: Recklessness race in space
]
[
Feb 14, 2008: United States is planning an anti-satellite test?
]
[
Feb 12, 2008: Where is the treaty?
]
[
Jan 31, 2008: What is legally binding?
]
[
Jan 15, 2008: Toward a Nuclear-Free World
]
[
Oct 18, 2007: Russia and nuclear disarmament
]
[
Aug 15, 2007: How to make U.S.-Russian relations meaningful
]
[
Aug 08, 2007: Cartwright on START and Global Prompt Strike
]
[
Jul 24, 2007: Members of Congress urge President Bush to extend START Treaty
]
[
Jul 12, 2007: RS-24 and Topol-M side by side
]
[
Jul 06, 2007: Is RS-24 a new missile?
]
[
Jul 03, 2007: Looking for a “post-START arrangement”
]
[
Jul 03, 2007: Why START is important
]
[
May 23, 2007: The U.S. and Russia's "ludicrous" missile defense rhetoric
]
[
Apr 30, 2007: Boris Yeltsin's arms control legacy
]
[
Apr 27, 2007: Irresponsible rhetoric
]
[
Apr 26, 2007: New START data released
]
[
Mar 24, 2007: Are the United States and Russia discussing START?
]
[
Feb 26, 2007: Missile defense: the Russian reaction
]
[
Jan 19, 2007: Is China repeating the old Soviet and U.S. mistakes?
]
[
Jan 17, 2007: Life after START
]
[
Oct 07, 2006: Russia and the Prompt Global Strike
]
[
Sep 25, 2006: No, Russian submarines do not carry tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Sep 15, 2006: Do Russian attack submarines carry nuclear weapons?
]
[
Aug 25, 2006: Russia wants to pull out of the INF Treaty
]
[
Russian version
]
Current status
Overview
Rocket Forces
Strategic fleet
Strategic aviation
Early warning
Military space
Featured articles
Where the weapons are - Nuclear weapon storage facilities in Russia
Very modest expectations: Performance of Moscow missile defense
How many warheads?
Bulava
The book
Overview
Reviews
Contents
Authors
Order
Russian edition
About the project
History
Contributors
Contact information
Search
Recent posts
Knyaz Pozharsky submarine to be accepted for service in June 2025
Launch of Cosmos-2580, a Lotos-S1 electronic reconnaissance satellite
Launch of Cosmos-2579 from Plesetsk
Strategic forces exercise includes a launch of Bulava
A failed test of Sarmat destroyed the test silo
Two small satellites launched by Angara from Plesetsk
Imperator Alexander III transferred to the Pacific Fleet
Launch of Cosmos-2576 from Plesetsk
Notes on small experimental satellites
Topol-ME launch from Kapustin Yar to Sary-Shagan
Archive
Administrivia
Arms control
Aviation
Budget
Early warning
Government
Industry
International affairs
Misc
Missile defense
Navy
Nuclear complex
Rocket Forces
Space
Strategic forces
Syndicate
RSS feed
[
What is RSS feed?
]
Powered by
Movable Type 6.3.6