Russian strategic nuclear forces
Home
|
Current status
|
Blog
|
Site map
|
Search
|
About the project
[
Home
] [
Blog
] [Arms control]
Blog archive - Arms control
[
Nov 16, 2023: The curious case of heavy bombers' Unique IDs
]
[
Jun 01, 2023: U.S. response to Russia's New START suspension
]
[
May 12, 2023: New START data as of March 2023
]
[
Feb 21, 2023: Russia suspends participation in New START
]
[
Oct 07, 2022: Non-strategic weapons storage and deployment procedures in Russia
]
[
Sep 01, 2022: New START numbers as of 1 September 2022
]
[
Mar 01, 2022: New START numbers as of 1 March 2022
]
[
Oct 26, 2021: New START data as of September 2021
]
[
Jun 02, 2021: In defense of silo-based MIRVed ICBMs
]
[
May 09, 2021: A note on mobile missiles in the Kataev archive
]
[
Apr 01, 2021: New START data exchange continues. Here are the March 2021 numbers
]
[
Oct 01, 2020: New START data as of 1 September 2020
]
[
Apr 02, 2020: New START data as of 1 March 2020
]
[
Nov 27, 2019: Russia shows Avangard system "to maintain viability" of New START
]
[
Oct 07, 2019: New START data as of 1 September 2019
]
[
May 20, 2019: Is New START extension really that easy?
]
[
Mar 30, 2019: New START data as of 1 March 2019
]
[
Feb 19, 2019: Did the United States just change its theory of INF violation?
]
[
Jan 23, 2019: Missile launches from Kapustin Yar in 2008-2014
]
[
Jan 23, 2019: Moscow shows the 9M729 missile and its launcher
]
[
Dec 01, 2018: What was so secret? United States presents its theory of the INF violation
]
[
Nov 26, 2018: Russia insists it is in compliance with the INF Treaty
]
[
Oct 07, 2018: New START data September 2018 numbers
]
[
Jul 01, 2018: Inspections will not resolve the INF Treaty dispute
]
[
Apr 15, 2018: New START controversies
]
[
Feb 05, 2018: New START reductions completed
]
[
Dec 05, 2017: The INF Treaty culprit identified. Now what?
]
[
Oct 02, 2017: New START data exchange shows the United States and Russia are on track to meet the limits
]
[
Aug 24, 2017: Where the weapons are - Nuclear weapon storage facilities in Russia
]
[
Jul 01, 2017: Is it too late to have an informed discussion about the INF treaty?
]
[
Apr 03, 2017: New START March 2017 numbers
]
[
Oct 05, 2016: New START September 2016 numbers
]
[
Apr 03, 2016: UNIDIR project on tactical nuclear weapons is looking for a researcher
]
[
Apr 01, 2016: New START March 2016 aggregate numbers
]
[
Dec 02, 2015: On timelines and technicalities - U.S. Congress holds hearing on INF violation
]
[
Oct 07, 2015: Syria strikes, Kalibr-NK, and the INF treaty
]
[
Oct 02, 2015: New START September 2015 aggregate numbers
]
[
Jun 23, 2015: Cruise missiles and INF - What about 9M729?
]
[
Jun 07, 2015: INF Treaty compliance update (sort of)
]
[
Apr 01, 2015: March 2015 New START aggregate numbers released
]
[
Oct 01, 2014: New START September 2014 numbers
]
[
Sep 23, 2014: NPOMash completed tests of new cruise missile, continues to work on new strategic system
]
[
Aug 28, 2014: More details on Russia and the INF violation
]
[
Aug 04, 2014: Russia and the INF Treaty violation
]
[
Jul 02, 2014: Russia corrected its March 2014 New START declaration
]
[
Apr 01, 2014: March 2014 New START numbers released
]
[
Jan 15, 2014: Russian strategic forces in January 2014
]
[
Dec 03, 2013: Treaty compliance controversies
]
[
Oct 02, 2013: September 2013 New START data
]
[
Jul 04, 2013: New Russian missile and INF Treaty
]
[
Jul 01, 2013: A case for unilateral US nuclear warhead reductions
]
[
Apr 17, 2013: New START as a model for transparency in nuclear disarmament
]
[
Apr 03, 2013: March 2013 New START data
]
[
Apr 02, 2013: Shooting down the Star Wars myth
]
[
Feb 06, 2013: Object 370, Project 4202 and construction in Dombarovskiy
]
[
Dec 17, 2012: START and INF treaty inspections and data exchange
]
[
Oct 31, 2012: The myth of strategic stability
]
[
Oct 03, 2012: September 2012 New START data released
]
[
Apr 12, 2012: Parsing the New START data
]
[
Apr 09, 2012: March 2012 New START data released
]
[
Nov 23, 2011: Russia's response to missile defense
]
[
Oct 22, 2011: September 2011 New START data released
]
[
Jun 01, 2011: Some New START data released
]
[
Apr 21, 2011: Some details of the New START negotiations
]
[
Apr 07, 2011: START-type data exchange
]
[
Mar 28, 2011: Where is the New START data?
]
[
Mar 01, 2011: Russia hardens its position on tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Feb 05, 2011: New START treaty enters into force
]
[
Jan 27, 2011: Russia ratified New START
]
[
Jan 14, 2011: Duma sets its own understandings of New START
]
[
Jan 06, 2011: Offense and defense after New START
]
[
Nov 30, 2010: Missiles and tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Nov 29, 2010: U.S.-Russian discussions of missile threats
]
[
Jul 06, 2010: Republicans question the New START Treaty
]
[
Apr 30, 2010: New START on rail-mobile ICBMs and reloads
]
[
Apr 08, 2010: New START Treaty signed
]
[
Mar 31, 2010: The New START bomber count and upload potential
]
[
Mar 29, 2010: Assessing START follow-on
]
[
Mar 27, 2010: New START treaty in numbers
]
[
Mar 26, 2010: New START Treaty deal reached
]
[
Mar 12, 2010: Missile defense poisons everything
]
[
Feb 25, 2010: What to do about tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Dec 04, 2009: START Treaty expires
]
[
Dec 02, 2009: Missed START deadline?
]
[
Nov 24, 2009: How easy is it to extend START?
]
[
Nov 17, 2009: START bridging agreement
]
[
Nov 11, 2009: Post-START verification gap
]
[
Oct 13, 2009: Will Russia's numbers decline without START follow-on?
]
[
Oct 09, 2009: Last START data exchange?
]
[
Jul 22, 2009: The Moscow summit: A positive first step
]
[
Jul 06, 2009: Good progress at the Moscow summit
]
[
Jul 02, 2009: Will missile defense derail START-Plus?
]
[
Jul 01, 2009: There are many ways to count launchers
]
[
Jun 19, 2009: Russia wants better deal on missile defense
]
[
May 26, 2009: Who is afraid of Rose Gottemoeller?
]
[
May 06, 2009: Missile defense ban through the back door
]
[
Apr 28, 2009: Will the new treaty get a name? How about START Plus?
]
[
Apr 22, 2009: No SORT after START?
]
[
Apr 21, 2009: Russia wants the ABM Treaty back
]
[
Apr 03, 2009: Reaction to the Obama-Medvedev joint statement on arms control
]
[
Apr 01, 2009: Medvedev-Obama statement on arms control
]
[
Mar 31, 2009: An arms control summit?
]
[
Mar 07, 2009: Russia clarifies its position on arms control treaty
]
[
Mar 04, 2009: Broadening the disarmament agenda through START
]
[
Jan 16, 2009: Russia's new arms development
]
[
Dec 18, 2008: Formulating the next U.S.-Russian arms control agreement
]
[
Nov 26, 2008: All clear for START extension
]
[
Oct 30, 2008: Post-START drafts
]
[
Oct 18, 2008: START extension formalities
]
[
Oct 17, 2008: No major changes in numbers in the first half of 2008
]
[
Sep 05, 2008: Work on post-START agreement
]
[
Jul 22, 2008: The Window of Vulnerability That Wasn't
]
[
Jun 03, 2008: The push for a new arms control agreement with Russia is ill-conceived
]
[
May 24, 2008: Post-START differences
]
[
Mar 04, 2008: Arms race then and now
]
[
Feb 29, 2008: The U.S. satellite shootdown: An unnecessary action
]
[
Feb 27, 2008: USA 193 debris
]
[
Feb 20, 2008: USA 193 intercept
]
[
Feb 15, 2008: Recklessness race in space
]
[
Feb 14, 2008: United States is planning an anti-satellite test?
]
[
Feb 12, 2008: Where is the treaty?
]
[
Jan 31, 2008: What is legally binding?
]
[
Jan 15, 2008: Toward a Nuclear-Free World
]
[
Oct 18, 2007: Russia and nuclear disarmament
]
[
Aug 15, 2007: How to make U.S.-Russian relations meaningful
]
[
Aug 08, 2007: Cartwright on START and Global Prompt Strike
]
[
Jul 24, 2007: Members of Congress urge President Bush to extend START Treaty
]
[
Jul 12, 2007: RS-24 and Topol-M side by side
]
[
Jul 06, 2007: Is RS-24 a new missile?
]
[
Jul 03, 2007: Looking for a “post-START arrangement”
]
[
Jul 03, 2007: Why START is important
]
[
May 23, 2007: The U.S. and Russia's "ludicrous" missile defense rhetoric
]
[
Apr 30, 2007: Boris Yeltsin's arms control legacy
]
[
Apr 27, 2007: Irresponsible rhetoric
]
[
Apr 26, 2007: New START data released
]
[
Mar 24, 2007: Are the United States and Russia discussing START?
]
[
Feb 26, 2007: Missile defense: the Russian reaction
]
[
Jan 19, 2007: Is China repeating the old Soviet and U.S. mistakes?
]
[
Jan 17, 2007: Life after START
]
[
Oct 07, 2006: Russia and the Prompt Global Strike
]
[
Sep 25, 2006: No, Russian submarines do not carry tactical nuclear weapons
]
[
Sep 15, 2006: Do Russian attack submarines carry nuclear weapons?
]
[
Aug 25, 2006: Russia wants to pull out of the INF Treaty
]
[
Russian version
]
Current status
Overview
Rocket Forces
Strategic fleet
Strategic aviation
Early warning
Military space
Featured articles
Where the weapons are - Nuclear weapon storage facilities in Russia
Very modest expectations: Performance of Moscow missile defense
How many warheads?
Bulava
The book
Overview
Reviews
Contents
Authors
Order
Russian edition
About the project
History
Contributors
Contact information
Search
Recent posts
Russian early-warning satellites may not be dead yet
The space segment of the Russian early-warning system is not in good shape
Oreshnik in Belarus?
Another attempt to launch Yars from Plesetsk
Deployment of Yars missiles in Kozelsk completed
Yars missiles start replacing Topol-M in Tatishchevo
Any space-based missile defense will have to meet actual missiles
Was there a Bulava launch in June 2025?
A cancelled or postponed Yars launch from Plesetsk
A failed test launch in Yasnyy/Dombarovskiy
Archive
Administrivia
Arms control
Aviation
Budget
Early warning
Government
Industry
International affairs
Misc
Missile defense
Navy
Nuclear complex
Rocket Forces
Space
Strategic forces
Syndicate
RSS feed
[
What is RSS feed?
]
Powered by
Movable Type 6.3.6