The K-51 Verkhoturie submarine of the Project 667BDRM/Delta IV class, which began overhaul in August 2010, will not return to active service until the end of 2012.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: https://russianforces.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1060
References to this entry
K-51 Verkhoturie submarine of the Project 667BDRM class has been launched on March 24, 2012 after a scheduled repair and overhaul that began in August 2010. The submarine is expected to return to service in the fall of 2012....
[Verkhoturie submarine launched after overhaul ] [March 25, 2012 11:59 AM] [#]
On November 22, 2012 K-51 Verkhoturie submarine of the Project 667BDRM class began sea trials that will conclude a medium overhaul of the submarine that began in August 2010. The submarine left the covered slipway in March 2012....
[Verkhoturie Project 667BDRM submarine prepares to return to service] [November 22, 2012 7:46 PM] [#]
Post a comment
Current status
Featured articles
About the project
Recent posts
- Space segment of Russia's early-warning system seems to be down to three satellites
- Launch of Cosmos-2584, second Glonass-K2 satellite
- Old UR-100NUTTH may still be in service
- Three military satellites launched from Plesetsk
- Knyaz Pozharsky submarine to be accepted for service in June 2025
- Launch of Cosmos-2580, a Lotos-S1 electronic reconnaissance satellite
- Launch of Cosmos-2579 from Plesetsk
- Strategic forces exercise includes a launch of Bulava
- A failed test of Sarmat destroyed the test silo
- Two small satellites launched by Angara from Plesetsk
Comments
These missiles (16) and warheads (64) counted as deployed or not ?
No, New START would not count these as operationally deployed.
So,how many other boomers counted as undeployed?
It's hard to know exactly. Some are in and out of active service. For example, Ekaterinburg submarine was moved to a floating dock recently.
Nuclear Notebook stated 100kt for a SS-N-23, but you stated 75kt for SS-N-20. I want to know yield of the SS-N-23 warhead. And I've read on this site that Sineva have (probably) new warhead-is this true? And what about Liner?
R-29RM warhead could be about 300kt - the throw-weight of the missile allows it. Sineva would probably have the same warhead. But not Liner - since it could carry about ten warheads, they would be smaller - maybe about 75-100 kt.
50kt -this is seven-warhead SS-N-18 as i understand.-right? Do you have a data on the SS-N-6 and SS-N-8 warheads?
Warheads on SS-N-23 very most likely 150 kt in yield. Even for R-36M2 GRV 4*0.8Mt+4*0.15Mt have been considered,but as 8.3mt and 20Mt have been canceled ,probably via perestroika.This is most likely a targeting question,not payload.Its very unlikely that Soviet SLBms were aimed on the hard targets.