Liner SLBM is not a mystery anymore - it is indeed a ten-warhead version of the R-29RM Sineva missile. A new book published by the Makeyev Design Bureau (my thanks to Alexander, who located the book and published the relevant excerpts) describes Liner as a R-29RMU2.1 missile that can carry "up to ten low-yield warheads with missile defense penetration aids, or eight low-yield warheads with additional penetration aids, of four medium-yield warheads with penetration aids."
The only difference between Liner and Sineva, which is identified as R-29RMU2, is apparently in the type of warheads that it can carry - unlike Sineva, Liner can be equipped with the new warhead that was developed for Bulava and RS-24 Yars. This new warhead is described as a joint development of the Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology, which apparently worked on the re-entry vehicle, and the VNIITF - the weapon lab in Snezhinsk (Chelyabinsk-70), which was responsible for the nuclear part of the warhead. To install this new warhead on the R-29RM missile, the Makeyev Design Bureau developed a system of adaptors that turn a Sineva into a Liner.
The new warhead was clearly in the works for quite some time (in fact, I was told that it's a design that had been tested before the Soviet Union ended its nuclear test program in 1991). One option that I described a few years ago seems to fit - a warhead that weighs about 90 kg and has a yield of about 100 kt (it would be similar to the U.S. W76). My estimate at the time was that a MIRVed Topol-M/RS-24 could carry a heavier warhead, but there is certainly nothing that would prevent it from having the light one.
Now I guess we should wait for MITT to publish a book that would describe the mysterious new ICBM that was tested a week ago. Makes you miss the good old START days when quite a bit of that information was public.
Comments
Fantastic information - something concrete on a (successful, it seems) new Russian rocketry development, even if just involves the last stage.
Out of curiosity, is there any indication as to what the source refers to with 'low yield' and 'medium yield' warheads?
If the Trident II can be taken as a good example - since the Sineva does largely share its payload vs range characteristics - then 4 'medium yield' W88-like warheads in the 500kt range would not be impossible. It would then make sense that "low yield" would refer to something, indeed, W76-like. Anyone have any ideas/speculation on this point?
Hi, just read on RIAN that the Russian Navy wants to deploy the Liner very soon. As the Sinewas on the refurbished 667BDRM's are all relative new, could this be accomplished by changing the bus on exisiting Sinewas, or would these missiles have to be newly produced. I assume Makeyew prefers the second option, but upgrading existing missiles should be faster and cheaper, if its possible.
Martin