On August 16, 2005, as part of an exercise of the Russian strategic forces, three Tu-160 strategic bombers conducted a test flight that involved launches of cruise missiles. The next day a submarine of the Northern Fleet performed a successful launch of a sea-launched ballistic missile from Barents sea.
The bombers took off from the Chkalovsky airport near Moscow at and flew to the Pem-boy test range near Vorkuta, where two of the bombers conducted launches of Kh-555 cruise missiles. All four missiles fired during the exercise were reported to be successful. After a five-hour flight, which included in-air refueling, the bombers landed at Olenegorsk airbase at Kola peninsula. During the flight, president Putin of Russia was on board of one of the aircraft.
The launch of a se-based ballistic missile, conducted the next day, was part of an exercise of the Northern Fleet. The launch was performed by the crew of the K-84 “Ekaterinburg” submarine of the Project 667BDRM (Delta IV) class from a submerged position in Barents sea at 11:06 MSK (07:06 UTC, some reports give 11:08 MSK as time of the launch) on August 17, 2005. The missile involved was referred to as “Sineva” – the modification of the R-29RM missile, which was deployed on Project 667BDRM submarines during their most recent overhaul. All warheads reached their targets at the Kura test site in Kamchatka peninsula.
Comments
It seems that flaws in the rsm-54 were fixed. Furthermore the conventional cruise missiles seems to be operational. After all the things start to improve. Fortunately the Yeltsin chaotic heritage is ending.
It is still only one submarine - Ekaterinburg - that manages to launch missiles sucessfully (in June 2004 and in September 2004, for example).
I don't think your comment is entirely correct, since the K-407 Novomoskovsk was used for the two higly important R-29RM launches on March 17th, 2004.
Yes, but it was only after the first attempt in February 2004 failed. In any event, Novomoskovsk has older version of the R-29RM missile (as did Karelia, which conducted the second failed launch that February). No further attempts to launch older R-29RM have been made after March 2004.
Thank you for your clarification, but I'm still rather dumbfounded by the fact that the Delta III submarines seem to have missiles in reasonably good shape, even though they are older than the R-29RMs. Could you explain this?
This is a very good question. I've been trying to look into it, but couldn't come up with a satisfactory explanation myself.