TrackBack URL for this entry: https://russianforces.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1067
The fire on the Ekaterinburg submarine in December 2011 was, as it turns out, a very serious incident - the submarine had full complement of torpedos and missiles on board. Reports in the Russian press - Novaya Gazeta and Kommersant-Vlast...
On February 3, 2012, Admiral Vladimir Vysotskiy, the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy announced that the Russian strategic submarines will resume regular patrols "on the 1st of July or a bit later." According to Vysotskiy, the Navy was awaiting t...
As much as I don't like the New START data exchange rules that keep almost all the data secret, on some level the uncertainty feels right. Indeed, why would anybody seriously care if there are, say, 55 or 50 SS-18...
Two Project 667BDRM submarines - Ekaterinburg and Bryansk - were moved to a dry dock in June 2012. Ekaterinburg was reported to begin an overhaul after the December 2011 fire on 21 June 2012. Bryansk was photographed in the PD-50...
After the release of the last START data exchange in 2009 it has become rather difficult to get a good breakdown of the numbers of deployed launchers and warheads - the aggregate New START numbers leave too much room...
Ekaterinburg submarine of the Project 667BDRM class is expected to be launched today after extensive repairs that followed the December 2011 fire. The submarine arrived to Zvezdochka ship repair plant in June 2012 and is expected to return to...
The Ekaterinburg submarine of the Project 667BDRM/Delta IV class and Vladimir Monomakh, the third submarine of the Project 955 Borey class, joined the fleet today. The Ekaterinburg was repaired at the Zvezdochka plant after the December 2011 fire on bo...
Comments
What in the world do they make the hull coating out of that it could burn for 24 hours without spreading inside the submarine? I imagine overhauling the fire to check for hot spots was pretty complicated since the coating is probably not easy to remove but I really doubt they flooded the dry dock just to be sure the fire was out. I am also curious if the temperature of the fire was hot enough to cause any deformation to the hull.
If I were part of the New START inspection team I would try and inspect this boat next if only to try and see how much damage was caused. Though the shipyard may not be on the list of "inspect-able" installations.
Its a pretty thick rubberized anti-acoustic coating
Videos of the fire fighters here: http://sorson.livejournal.com/27124.html
Pretty clear that the fire is burning between the inner pressure hull and the outer hull (or is it merely a super structure?) No wonder they had to flood the dry dock to get the fire out.
Any bets on how long it will take to repair? One of the videos clearly shows water being sprayed into the torpedo tube and also appears to show water leaking out from the bow in areas that do not appear to be regular hull penetrations indicating some pretty heavy damage to that outer hull/super structure.
Keith, the original repair works for done on polymer front hull section which had a light hull breach of some sort, so the size of the "hole" is not due to the fire.
I am more interested in the reports of potential damage to the sonar. While MGK-500 is technically replaceable (several antennas were manufactured for Borei class submarines recently), the version of MGK-500 on Delta IV is slightly different from the one of Akula and Borei. Perhaps they can salvage the sonar off of the BS-64 special purpose submarine (former Delta IV converted as a mini-sub mothership)? Keeping BS-64 grounded for longer sounds to me like a more optimal solution than scrapping one of the SSBNs.
to artjomh:
I red your professional comments in military photos and closely followed the BS-64 issue.
If you are right and they are going to salvage that sonar too it could well mean the final end of the curious BS-64 drama...